Re: [PATCH 17/30] tracing: Improve panic/die notifiers

[Guilherme G. Piccoli]

On 29/04/2022 10:23, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 12:22:44 +0300
> Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>> +	switch (ev) {
>>> +	case DIE_OOPS:
>>> +		do_dump = 1;
>>> +		break;
>>> +	case PANIC_NOTIFIER:
>>> +		do_dump = 1;
>>> +		break;  
>>
>>    Why not:
>>
>> 	case DIE_OOPS:
>> 	case PANIC_NOTIFIER:
>> 		do_dump = 1;
>> 		break;
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> Other than that.
> 
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> -- Steve

Thanks Sergei and Steven, good idea! I thought about the switch change
you propose, but I confess I got a bit confused by the "fallthrough"
keyword - do I need to use it?

About the s/int/bool, for sure! Not sure why I didn't use bool at
first...heheh

Cheers,


Guilherme