Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,gcc-apq8064: Fix typo in compatible and split apq8084

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 26/04/2022 00:39, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2022-04-25 13:40:01)
>> The qcom,gcc-apq8064.yaml was meant to describe only APQ8064 and APQ8084
>> should have slightly different bindings (without Qualcomm thermal sensor
>> device).
>>
>> Fixes: a469bf89a009 ("dt-bindings: clock: simplify qcom,gcc-apq8064 Documentation")
>> Reported-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  .../bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-apq8064.yaml      |  4 +-
>>  .../bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-apq8084.yaml      | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-apq8084.yaml
> 
> If it's generated with 'format-patch -C -M' does it detect the copy?

Nope, and I think these are default. The files are not that similar,
because while copying I cleaned it up.

format-patch -C20% -M20% also does not detect it. Only `git format-patch
-1 -C20% -M20% --find-copies-harder` detects a copy. I will use it, but
you won't see nice copy-patch.

> 
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-apq8084.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-apq8084.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..63d08e82b3d8
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-apq8084.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/qcom,gcc-apq8084.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Qualcomm Global Clock & Reset Controller Binding for APQ8084
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> +  - Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> +  - Taniya Das <tdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Please fix Taniya's email quic_tdas@xxxxxxxxxxx

I wished Codeaurora/QUIC folks updated their emails all over the tree
because otherwise it looks like they do not want or cannot maintain
these files.

Best regards,
Krzysztof