Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: update IOMAP FILESYSTEM LIBRARY and XFS FILESYSTEM

From: Darrick J. Wong
Date: Tue Apr 12 2022 - 19:21:58 EST


On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 12:55:39PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>
>
> On 04/12/2022 11:50 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 08:39:17PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 11:21:26AM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> > > > Remove the following section entries of IOMAP FILESYSTEM LIBRARY:
> > > >
> > > > M: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > M: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > > Remove the following section entry of XFS FILESYSTEM:
> > > >
> > > > M: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > WTF?
> > >
> > > ▄▄ ▄ ▄▄ ▄ ▄
> > > █▀▄ █ ██ █ ▄▀
> > > █ █▄ █ █ █ █▄█
> > > █ █ █ █▄▄█ █ █▄
> > > █ ██ █ █ █ ▀▄
> >
> > *OH*, I see, you're getting rid of the M(ail): entry, probably because
> > it's redundant with L(ist): or something?? Still... why does it matter?
>
> Yes, the section entries are redundant. Sorry for the unclear description.
>
> The intention of this patch is to clean up the redundant section entries.
>
> >
> > Seriously, changelogs need to say /why/ they're changing something, not
> > simply restate what's already in the diff.
>
> OK, thank you. Should I send a v2 patch to update the commit message
> or just ignore this patch?

Yes, please send a v2 patch with an improved commit message. NAK
withdrawn.

--D

> Thanks,
> Tiezhu
>