Re: [PATCH] wlcore: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[Kalle Valo]

cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx writes:

> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
> for simplifing code
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx>

Please try to make the patch titles unique, you have already submitted a
patch with the same name:

wlcore: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20220408081205.2494512-1-chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx/

I'll rename this patch to:

wlcore: main: use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead of pm_runtime_get_sync()

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches