[PATCH] drm/msm: Fix range size vs end confusion

From: Rob Clark
Date: Thu Apr 07 2022 - 16:40:06 EST


From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

The fourth param is size, rather than range_end.

Note that we could increase the address space size if we had a way to
prevent buffers from spanning a 4G split, mostly just to avoid fw bugs
with 64b math.

Fixes: 84c31ee16f90 ("drm/msm/a6xx: Add support for per-instance pagetables")
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
index 17de46fc4bf2..80d57608b34a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
@@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ a6xx_create_private_address_space(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
return ERR_CAST(mmu);

return msm_gem_address_space_create(mmu,
- "gpu", 0x100000000ULL, 0x1ffffffffULL);
+ "gpu", 0x100000000ULL, SZ_4G);
}

static uint32_t a6xx_get_rptr(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct msm_ringbuffer *ring)
--
2.35.1