Re: [v7 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: Add Maxim MAX735x/MAX736x variants

From: Rob Herring
Date: Wed Apr 06 2022 - 16:23:37 EST


On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 04:46:34PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 02:05:49PM +0200, Patrick Rudolph wrote:
> > Update the pca954x bindings to add support for the Maxim MAX735x/MAX736x
> > chips. The functionality will be provided by the exisintg pca954x driver.
> >
> > While on it make the interrupts support conditionally as not all of the
> > existing chips have interrupts.
> >
> > For chips that are powered off by default add an optional regulator
> > called vdd-supply.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.yaml | 44 ++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.yaml
> > index 9f1726d0356b..132c3e54e7ab 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.yaml
> > @@ -4,21 +4,48 @@
> > $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.yaml#
> > $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >
> > -title: NXP PCA954x I2C bus switch
> > +title: NXP PCA954x I2C and compatible bus switches
> >
> > maintainers:
> > - Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > description:
> > - The binding supports NXP PCA954x and PCA984x I2C mux/switch devices.
> > + The binding supports NXP PCA954x and PCA984x I2C mux/switch devices,
> > + and the Maxim MAX735x and MAX736x I2C mux/switch devices.
> >
> > allOf:
> > - $ref: /schemas/i2c/i2c-mux.yaml#
> > + - if:
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + contains:
> > + enum:
> > + - maxim,max7367
> > + - maxim,max7369
> > + - nxp,pca9542
> > + - nxp,pca9543
> > + - nxp,pca9544
> > + - nxp,pca9545
> > + then:
> > + properties:
> > + interrupts:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + "#interrupt-cells":
> > + const: 2
> > +
> > + interrupt-controller: true
>
> It feels a bit out of place to have those properties listed before the
> main "properties" property, but we can only have a sincel allOf. I
> wonder if the i2c-mux schema could be selected automatically based on
> node name, but that's out of scope for this patch.

Yes, just move the allOf below 'properties'

> I thought it was more customary to define properties in the main
> "properties" property, and then have

Yes, please do.

Rob