Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] rpmb subsystem, uapi and virtio-rpmb driver

[Bean Huo]

On Tue, 2022-04-05 at 16:43 +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> 
> Bean Huo <huobean@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Hi Alex,
> > 
> > Thanks for this unified RPMB interface, I wanted to verify this on
> > our
> > UFS, it seems you didn't add the UFS access interface in this
> > version 
> > from your userspace tools, right?
> 
> No I didn't but it should be easy enough to add some function pointer
> redirection everywhere one of the op_* functions calls a vrpmb_*
> function. Do you already have a UFS RPMB device driver?
> 

Hi Alex,
Thanks for your feedback.

We now access UFS RPMB through the RPMB LUN BSG device, RPMB is a well-
known LU and we have a userspace tool to access it.

I see that if we're going to use your interface, "static struct
rpmb_ops" should be registered from a lower-level driver, for example
in a UFS driver, yes there should be no problem with this registration,
but I don't know with the current way Compared, what are the advantages
to add a driver. maybe the main advantage is that we will have an
unified user space tool for RPMB. right?

Kind regards,
Bean