Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: rk3188: correct interrupt flags

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 14:08, Heiko Stübner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Am Freitag, 2. Oktober 2020, 18:11:28 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 08:52:10PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
> > > These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
> > > have the same meaning:
> > > 1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> > > 2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW  = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
> > >
> > > Correct the interrupt flags without affecting the code:
> > >   ACTIVE_HIGH => IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Not tested on HW.
> > >
> > > Changes since v1:
> > > 1. Correct title
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3188-bqedison2qc.dts | 3 ++-
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Any comments/review/testing from Heiko or other Rockchip folks? Shall I
> > cc here someone?
>
> I'm actually wondering about this ... I somehow remember writing a response,
> but don't see it in my history - so it might have gotten lost before I
> actually sent it.
>
> I think the biggest issue I have is that none of that is tested on any
> hardware and looking at other brcm wifi drivers in the kernel, the
> interrupt polarity seems to be all over the place, some set it high,
> some low and I even have seen edge triggers.
>
> As all changes are in regard to (copied) brcm wifi node, it would be
> really interesting to actually know what trigger is the right one.
>
> I've Cc'ed Jagan who I think has worked on an affected board,
> maybe he can check which trigger is correct.

Hi Heiko,

Nothing moved here since 2020 and the DTSes still have incorrect flags
for interrupts.

I can rebase and resend (although maybe it still applies cleanly), but
more important - is someone going to take this patch? or test it?

Best regards,
Krzysztof