Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] KVM: Replace bare 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int'

[Joe Perches]

On Sat, 2022-03-05 at 20:44 -0500, Henry Sloan wrote:
> I agree the bool conversion should be a separate patch. Would it be proper
> to resubmit the whole patchset with a new, seventh patch containing the
> bool conversion? If I was to do so, should all of those patches be labelled
> v2, but without any changelogs since none of the present patches will have
> been changed?

Generally yes, but it depends on the upstream maintainer's preference.

Ideally:

o a 0/n patch cover letter could be used to describe the change/addition
o each proposed patch has a patch description above your Signed-off-by: