Re: [PATCH v2 15/39] x86/ibt,kprobes: Fix more +0 assumptions

[Naveen N. Rao]

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> How does this look?

I gave this a quick test on powerpc and this looks good to me.

> --- a/include/linux/kprobes.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kprobes.h
> @@ -265,7 +265,6 @@ extern int arch_init_kprobes(void);
>  extern void kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(struct kprobe *p);
>  extern bool arch_within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr);
>  extern int arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist(void);
> -extern bool arch_kprobe_on_func_entry(unsigned long offset);

There is a __weak definition of this function in kernel/kprobes.c which 
should also be removed.


Thanks,
Naveen