Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] hwmon (xdpe12284): Add support for xdpe11280

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Tue Mar 01 2022 - 14:20:42 EST


On 3/1/22 10:01, Marcello Sylvester Bauer wrote:
Add support for another Infineon Multi-phase controller chip. The
xdpe11280 uses linear instead of vid data format for VOUT. Detect
VOUT_MODE format during probing and set the xdpe122 related pointers
in case it uses vid.

Signed-off-by: Marcello Sylvester Bauer <sylv@xxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/hwmon/xdpe12284.rst | 12 ++++++++----
drivers/hwmon/pmbus/xdpe12284.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/hwmon/xdpe12284.rst b/Documentation/hwmon/xdpe12284.rst
index 67d1f87808e5..a224dc74ad35 100644
--- a/Documentation/hwmon/xdpe12284.rst
+++ b/Documentation/hwmon/xdpe12284.rst
@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ Kernel driver xdpe122
Supported chips:
+ * Infineon XDPE11280
+
+ Prefix: 'xdpe11280'
+
* Infineon XDPE12254
Prefix: 'xdpe12254'
@@ -20,10 +24,10 @@ Authors:
Description
-----------
-This driver implements support for Infineon Multi-phase XDPE122 family
-dual loop voltage regulators.
-The family includes XDPE12284 and XDPE12254 devices.
-The devices from this family complaint with:
+This driver implements support for Infineon Multi-phase XDPE112 and XDPE122
+family dual loop voltage regulators.
+These families include XDPE11280, XDPE12284 and XDPE12254 devices.
+The devices from this family compliant with:
- Intel VR13 and VR13HC rev 1.3, IMVP8 rev 1.2 and IMPVP9 rev 1.3 DC-DC
converter specification.
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/xdpe12284.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/xdpe12284.c
index b07da06a40c9..3413aba9d5be 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/xdpe12284.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/xdpe12284.c
@@ -110,7 +110,6 @@ static int xdpe122_identify(struct i2c_client *client,
static struct pmbus_driver_info xdpe122_info = {
.pages = XDPE122_PAGE_NUM,
.format[PSC_VOLTAGE_IN] = linear,
- .format[PSC_VOLTAGE_OUT] = vid,
.format[PSC_TEMPERATURE] = linear,
.format[PSC_CURRENT_IN] = linear,
.format[PSC_CURRENT_OUT] = linear,
@@ -123,23 +122,39 @@ static struct pmbus_driver_info xdpe122_info = {
PMBUS_HAVE_IIN | PMBUS_HAVE_IOUT | PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_IOUT |
PMBUS_HAVE_TEMP | PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_TEMP |
PMBUS_HAVE_POUT | PMBUS_HAVE_PIN | PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_INPUT,
- .identify = xdpe122_identify,
- .read_word_data = xdpe122_read_word_data,
};
static int xdpe122_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
{
struct pmbus_driver_info *info;
+ int vout_mode;
info = devm_kmemdup(&client->dev, &xdpe122_info, sizeof(*info),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!info)
return -ENOMEM;
+ vout_mode = pmbus_read_byte_data(client, 0, PMBUS_VOUT_MODE);
+ if (vout_mode >= 0 && vout_mode != 0xff) {
+ switch (vout_mode >> 5) {
+ case 0:
+ info->format[PSC_VOLTAGE_OUT] = linear;
+ break;
+ case 1:
+ info->format[PSC_VOLTAGE_OUT] = vid;
+ info->identify = xdpe122_identify;
+ info->read_word_data = xdpe122_read_word_data;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ }

I am not entirely happy with this. Why not detect the mode (linear vs. vid)
in the identify function ?

Thanks,
Guenter

+
return pmbus_do_probe(client, info);
}
static const struct i2c_device_id xdpe122_id[] = {
+ {"xdpe11280", 0},
{"xdpe12254", 0},
{"xdpe12284", 0},
{}
@@ -148,6 +163,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id xdpe122_id[] = {
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, xdpe122_id);
static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused xdpe122_of_match[] = {
+ {.compatible = "infineon,xdpe11280"},
{.compatible = "infineon,xdpe12254"},
{.compatible = "infineon,xdpe12284"},
{}