[PATCH v1] mm, hwpoison: remove obsolete comment

[Naoya Horiguchi]

From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@xxxxxxx>

With the introduction of mf_mutex, most of memory error handling
process is mutually exclusive, so the in-line comment about
subtlety about double-checking PageHWPoison is no more correct.
So remove it.

Suggested-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@xxxxxxx>
---
 mm/memory-failure.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index 4c9bd1d37301..a6a1e02759e7 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -2146,12 +2146,6 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page)
 		.gfp_mask = GFP_USER | __GFP_MOVABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL,
 	};
 
-	/*
-	 * Check PageHWPoison again inside page lock because PageHWPoison
-	 * is set by memory_failure() outside page lock. Note that
-	 * memory_failure() also double-checks PageHWPoison inside page lock,
-	 * so there's no race between soft_offline_page() and memory_failure().
-	 */
 	lock_page(page);
 	if (!PageHuge(page))
 		wait_on_page_writeback(page);
-- 
2.25.1