Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/sgx: account backing pages

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 03:55:43PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 1/14/22 3:52 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >> I can understand your hesitation, but I agree with Dave here that
> >> wrapping the function makes the code more clear. I would prefer to keep
> >> this the way it is.
> > What if sgx_encl_get_backing() was changed as "static inline", if the
> > only motivation is encapsulation?
> 
> What would the purpose be of adding an 'inline' to the function definition?

Agreed, not much sense to do this. I just had troubles to get the way
things were encapsulated before your response.

/Jarkko