Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] media: hevc: Remove RPS named flags

From: Benjamin Gaignard
Date: Fri Jan 07 2022 - 11:02:47 EST



Le 05/01/2022 à 13:26, Ezequiel Garcia a écrit :
Hi Benjamin,

On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 08:38:41AM +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
Marking a picture as long-term reference is valid for DPB but not for RPS.
Change flag name to match with it description in HEVC spec chapiter
"8.3.2 Decoding process for reference picture set".
Remove the other unused RPS flags.

A change like this, which is affecting a kernel interface and has impact
on userspace and drivers, requires a lot more attention in the commit description.

If I understand correctly, this change is related to how HEVC was first
introduced and how the DPB was originally represented in V4L2.

Originally, a DPB entry struct v4l2_hevc_dpb_entry had an rps field
which can be:

V4L2_HEVC_DPB_ENTRY_RPS_ST_CURR_BEFORE
V4L2_HEVC_DPB_ENTRY_RPS_ST_CURR_AFTER
V4L2_HEVC_DPB_ENTRY_RPS_LT_CURR

Perhaps this idea followed libva, where a VAPictureHEVC has flags field
which can be:

VA_PICTURE_HEVC_RPS_ST_CURR_BEFORE,
VA_PICTURE_HEVC_RPS_ST_CURR_AFTER,
VA_PICTURE_HEVC_RPS_LT_CURR,
VA_PICTURE_HEVC_LONG_TERM_REFERENCE

In this representation, the sets PocStCurrBefore, PocStCurrAfter,
PocLtCurr are implicit, and must be built by the kernel from the DPB
entries struct v4l2_hevc_dpb_entry, using the information in the rps field.

Last year, we changed this with your commit:

commit d395a78db9eabd12633b39e05c80e803543b6590
Author: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Jun 3 13:49:57 2021 +0200

media: hevc: Add decode params control

Which added the control v4l2_ctrl_hevc_decode_params, which includes
the sets PocStCurrBefore, PocStCurrAfter, PocLtCurr explicitly and therefore
moved the responsability of creating and maintaining the sets to userspace.

This effectively made the rps field in the struct v4l2_hevc_dpb_entry
useless. The longterm flag is still needed though for a DPB entry.

With this in mind, you could even say this commit is doing actually two
things:

1. Removes the unused rps field.
2. Adds a flag field, for the longterm DPB entry boolean.

Do you think a single byte of flags will be OK for a DPB entry?
I think so, but I'd love yours/others input here.

In ITU HEVC spec it is said that:
"When a picture is referred to as being marked as "used for reference",
this collectively refers to the picture being marked as "used
for
short-term reference" or "used for long-term reference" (but not both)."

So I believe that a single if enough for DPB entry.


If the above is more or less accurate then, and provided you
submit a new version with a more detailed commit description:

I will follow your suggestions and improve it in v5


Reviewed-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Also, a small question:

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
version 4:
- check flags with & and not ==

Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-codec.rst | 8 +++-----
drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_g2_hevc_dec.c | 2 +-
drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_h265.c | 2 +-
include/media/hevc-ctrls.h | 6 ++----
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-codec.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-codec.rst
index e141f0e4eec9..38da33e61c3d 100644
--- a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-codec.rst
+++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-codec.rst
@@ -3166,11 +3166,9 @@ enum v4l2_mpeg_video_hevc_size_of_length_field -
:c:func:`v4l2_timeval_to_ns()` function to convert the struct
:c:type:`timeval` in struct :c:type:`v4l2_buffer` to a __u64.
* - __u8
- - ``rps``
- - The reference set for the reference frame
- (V4L2_HEVC_DPB_ENTRY_RPS_ST_CURR_BEFORE,
- V4L2_HEVC_DPB_ENTRY_RPS_ST_CURR_AFTER or
- V4L2_HEVC_DPB_ENTRY_RPS_LT_CURR)
+ - ``flags``
+ - Long term flag for the reference frame
+ (V4L2_HEVC_DPB_ENTRY_LONG_TERM_REFERENCE)
Is this longterm flag associated in any way to a syntax element
or an HEVC process? If so, please document that.

done in v5.

Thanks for your review.

Benjamin


Thanks,
Ezequiel