Re: [RFC PATCH net] net/smc: Reset conn->lgr when link group registration fails

[Wen Gu]

Thanks for your reply.

On 2022/1/3 6:52 pm, Karsten Graul wrote:
> On 30/12/2021 04:50, Wen Gu wrote:
> > Thanks for your reply.
> >
> > On 2021/12/29 9:07 pm, Karsten Graul wrote:
> > > On 28/12/2021 08:49, Wen Gu wrote:
> > > > SMC connections might fail to be registered to a link group due to
> > > > things like unable to find a link to assign to in its creation. As
> > > > a result, connection creation will return a failure and most
> > > > resources related to the connection won't be applied or initialized,
> > > > such as conn->abort_work or conn->lnk.
> > > What I do not understand is the extra step after the new label out_unreg: that
> > > may invoke smc_lgr_schedule_free_work(). You did not talk about that one.
> > > Is the idea to have a new link group get freed() when a connection could not
> > > be registered on it?
> > Maybe we should try to free the link group when the registration fails, no matter
> > it is new created or already existing? If so, is it better to do it in the same
> > place like label 'out_unreg'?
>
> I agree with your idea.
>
> With the proposed change that conn->lgr gets not even set when the registration fails
> we would not need the "conn->lgr = NULL;" after label out_unreg?

Yes, conn->lgr now will be reset in smc_lgr_register_conn() if registration fails.

> And as far as I understand the invocation of smc_lgr_schedule_free_work(lgr) is only
> needed after label "create", because when an existing link group was found and the registration
> failed then its free work would already be started when no more connections are assigned
> to the link group, right?

Thanks for your explanation. I also agree with only invoking smc_lgr_schedule_free_work(lgr)
after label "create" now. I will improve it and send a v2 patch.

Thanks,
Wen Gu