Re: [PATCH v2 25/48] perf stat-display: Avoid use of core for CPU.

From: Namhyung Kim
Date: Tue Dec 28 2021 - 19:09:59 EST


On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 11:47 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Correct use of cpumap index in print_no_aggr_metric.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
[SNIP]
> @@ -924,29 +921,32 @@ static void print_no_aggr_metric(struct perf_stat_config *config,
> struct evlist *evlist,
> char *prefix)
> {
> - int cpu;
> - int nrcpus = 0;
> - struct evsel *counter;
> - u64 ena, run, val;
> - double uval;
> - struct aggr_cpu_id id;
> + int cpu, nrcpus;
>
> nrcpus = evlist->core.cpus->nr;
> for (cpu = 0; cpu < nrcpus; cpu++) {
> + struct evsel *counter;
> bool first = true;
>
> if (prefix)
> fputs(prefix, config->output);
> evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, counter) {
> - id = aggr_cpu_id__empty();
> - id.core = cpu;
> + u64 ena, run, val;
> + double uval;
> + struct aggr_cpu_id id;
> + int idx = perf_cpu_map__idx(evsel__cpus(counter), cpu);

Not sure about this. Here the 'cpu' is an index for the
evlist->core.cpus, not a CPU number. But the
perf_cpu_map__idx() requires a CPU number, right?

Thanks,
Namhyung


> +
> + if (idx < 0)
> + continue;
> +
> + id = aggr_cpu_id__cpu(cpu, /*data=*/NULL);
> if (first) {
> aggr_printout(config, counter, id, 0);
> first = false;
> }
> - val = perf_counts(counter->counts, cpu, 0)->val;
> - ena = perf_counts(counter->counts, cpu, 0)->ena;
> - run = perf_counts(counter->counts, cpu, 0)->run;
> + val = perf_counts(counter->counts, idx, 0)->val;
> + ena = perf_counts(counter->counts, idx, 0)->ena;
> + run = perf_counts(counter->counts, idx, 0)->run;
>
> uval = val * counter->scale;
> printout(config, id, 0, counter, uval, prefix,
> --
> 2.34.1.307.g9b7440fafd-goog
>