Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: usercopy: Warn vmalloc/module address in check_heap_object()

From: Kefeng Wang
Date: Tue Dec 28 2021 - 00:12:34 EST



On 2021/12/27 1:33, Christophe Leroy wrote:

Le 25/12/2021 à 13:06, Kefeng Wang a écrit :
virt_addr_valid() could be insufficient to validate the virt addr
on some architecture, which could lead to potential BUG which has
been found on arm64/powerpc64.

Let's add WARN_ON to check if the virt addr is passed virt_addr_valid()
but is a vmalloc/module address.
I think that's the responsibility of the architecture and doesn't
deserve a WARN_ON() in generic code.

The generic code cannot check all what architectures do wrong.

Eventually you can do some testing at startup, maybe with
CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE, but I don't think we should have such
verification in functions like check_heap_object()

Ok, we could find other better place to add a virt_to_valid() check

instead of this one.

Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/usercopy.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/usercopy.c b/mm/usercopy.c
index b3de3c4eefba..ce83e0b137dd 100644
--- a/mm/usercopy.c
+++ b/mm/usercopy.c
@@ -228,6 +228,8 @@ static inline void check_heap_object(const void *ptr, unsigned long n,
if (!virt_addr_valid(ptr))
return;
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(ptr));
+
/*
* When CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y, kmap_to_page() will give either the
* highmem page or fallback to virt_to_page(). The following