Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] remoteproc sysfs fixes/improvements

[Christian Gmeiner]

Hi all.

Am Sa., 21. Nov. 2020 um 04:05 Uhr schrieb Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx>:
>
> Hi All,
>
> This is a refresh of the unaccepted patches from an old series [1].
> Patches 2 and 3 from that series were merged and these are rebased and
> revised versions of the same patches. I had forgotten about these patches,
> and am resurrecting these again. Patches are on top of latest 5.10-rc4.
>
> The features being introduced here will be needed by the recently posted PRU
> remoteproc driver [2] in addition to the existing Wkup M3 remoteproc driver.
> Both of these drivers follow a client-driven boot methodology, with the latter
> strictly booted by another driver in kernel. The PRU remoteproc driver will be
> supporting both in-kernel clients as well as control from userspace orthogonally.
> The logic though is applicable and useful to any remoteproc driver not using
> 'auto-boot' and using an external driver/application to boot the remoteproc.
>
> regards
> Suman
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/cover/20180915003725.17549-1-s-anna@xxxxxx/
> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/cover/20201119140850.12268-1-grzegorz.jaszczyk@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Suman Anna (3):
>   remoteproc: Fix unbalanced boot with sysfs for no auto-boot rprocs
>   remoteproc: Introduce deny_sysfs_ops flag
>   remoteproc: wkup_m3: Set deny_sysfs_ops flag
>
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/remoteproc/wkup_m3_rproc.c    |  1 +
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h            |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --
> 2.28.0
>

Is there any update on this patch series?

-- 
greets
--
Christian Gmeiner, MSc

https://christian-gmeiner.info/privacypolicy