Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce PRU remoteproc consumer API

From: Christian Gmeiner
Date: Sun Dec 26 2021 - 08:00:22 EST


HI all,

Am Di., 26. Jan. 2021 um 06:58 Uhr schrieb Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx>:
>
> Hi Santosh,
>
> On 1/24/21 10:34 PM, santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Hi Suman, Mathieu,
> >
> > On 1/7/21 2:49 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> >> On 1/7/21 4:44 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 06:03:25PM -0600, Suman Anna wrote:
> >>>> Hi Mathieu,
> >>>>
> > [...]
> >>> I only see input from Andy and Lars in the thread you point out, nothing from
> >>> Greg. I have also taken a look at the patch [1] that made checkpatch complain
> >>> about ENOTSUPP. From what I see in that commit log the goal is to prevent new
> >>> additions of ENOTSUPP to the kernel.
> >>>
> >>> Please modify and resend, otherwise I'm sure someone will send another patch to
> >>> fix it before the end of the cycle.
> >>
> >> Yeah ok. I will send out a v3.
> >>
> > I haven't seen v3 of this series yet. Please post it
> > if you would like to include it for 5.12.
>
> This series is dependent on couple of patches that would have to come through
> the remoteproc tree first, and I need to post the next versions of those as
> well. So, let me sort out those first. You can drop this from your queue for 5.12.
>

Is there any update on this patch series?

--
greets
--
Christian Gmeiner, MSc

https://christian-gmeiner.info/privacypolicy