On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 07:13:02PM +0530, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) wrote:
On 11/25/2021 8:54 PM, Mark Brown wrote:No, the MFD can register whatever children it likes without needing any
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 03:12:29PM +0530, Satya Priya wrote:For the regulator driver to be probed we do need a separate compatible
+properties:Why are we adding a separate compatible for this when we already know
+ compatible:
+ const: qcom,pm8008-regulators
that this is a pm8008 based on the parent?
right? may be I didn't get your question..
My understanding is we should have a separate compatible for each peripheral
under the parent mfd node.. like gpios, temp alarm, regulators etc..
help from the DT.
No. I'm saying you should document these at the chip level, they doSo, if i understand correctly, we don't have to mention these in the+ vdd_l1_l2-supply:These supply nodes should be chip level, they're going into the chip and
+ description: Input supply phandle of ldo1 and ldo2 regulators.
in general the expectation is that you should be able to describe the
supplies going into a device without worrying about how or if any
particular OS splits things up.
documentation as these are handled at framework level?
need to be documented though.