Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] wilc1000: Document enable-gpios and reset-gpios properties

[Rob Herring]

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 5:30 PM David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2021-12-14 at 14:04 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 16:33:22 +0000, David Mosberger-Tang wrote:
> > > Add documentation for the ENABLE and RESET GPIOs that may be needed by
> > > wilc1000-spi.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  .../net/wireless/microchip,wilc1000.yaml        | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> > >
> >
> > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> >
> > yamllint warnings/errors:
> >
> > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> > Error: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/microchip,wilc1000.example.dts:30.37-38 syntax error
> > FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
> > make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.lib:373: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/microchip,wilc1000.example.dt.yaml] Error 1
> > make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > make: *** [Makefile:1413: dt_binding_check] Error 2
>
> So this error appears due to GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH and GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW in these
> lines:
>
>         enable-gpios = <&pioA 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>         reset-gpios = <&pioA 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>
> I can replace those with 0 and 1 respectively, but I doubt a lot of people would
> recognize what those integers standard for.  Is there a better way to get this
> to pass?

Include the header(s) you use in the example.

Rob