Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: i2c Add regulator to pca954x

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Patrick,

Thank you for the patch.

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:50:20AM +0100, Patrick Rudolph wrote:
> Add a regulator called vcc and update the example.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.yaml | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.yaml
> index bd794cb80c11..5add7db02c0c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.yaml
> @@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ properties:
>      description: if present, overrides i2c-mux-idle-disconnect
>      $ref: /schemas/mux/mux-controller.yaml#/properties/idle-state
>  
> +  vcc-supply:
> +    description: An optional voltage regulator supplying power to the chip.

The NXP datasheet names the supply VDD, could we use vdd-supply here ? I
also wouldn't call it ooptional (even if it effectively is from a DT
point of view as the property isn't listed as required), given that the
power supply isn't optional for the chip to function. How about the
following ?

  vdd-supply:
    description: The voltage regulator powering to the VDD supply.

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> +
>  required:
>    - compatible
>    - reg
> @@ -84,6 +87,8 @@ examples:
>              #size-cells = <0>;
>              reg = <0x74>;
>  
> +            vcc-supply = <&p3v3>;
> +
>              interrupt-parent = <&ipic>;
>              interrupts = <17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
>              interrupt-controller;

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart