Re: [PATCH] rtc: Move variable into switch case statement

From: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Date: Mon Dec 13 2021 - 19:41:48 EST


On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 08:39:15PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> When building with automatic stack variable initialization, GCC 12
> complains about variables defined outside of switch case statements.
> Move the variable into the case that uses it, which silences the warning:
>
> drivers/rtc/dev.c: In function 'rtc_dev_ioctl':
> drivers/rtc/dev.c:394:30: warning: statement will never be executed [-Wswitch-unreachable]
> 394 | long offset;
> | ^~~~~~
>
> Fixes: 6a8af1b6568a ("rtc: add parameter ioctl")
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks
--
Gustavo

> ---
> drivers/rtc/dev.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/dev.c b/drivers/rtc/dev.c
> index e104972a28fd..69325aeede1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/dev.c
> @@ -391,14 +391,14 @@ static long rtc_dev_ioctl(struct file *file,
> }
>
> switch(param.param) {
> - long offset;
> case RTC_PARAM_FEATURES:
> if (param.index != 0)
> err = -EINVAL;
> param.uvalue = rtc->features[0];
> break;
>
> - case RTC_PARAM_CORRECTION:
> + case RTC_PARAM_CORRECTION: {
> + long offset;
> mutex_unlock(&rtc->ops_lock);
> if (param.index != 0)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static long rtc_dev_ioctl(struct file *file,
> if (err == 0)
> param.svalue = offset;
> break;
> -
> + }
> default:
> if (rtc->ops->param_get)
> err = rtc->ops->param_get(rtc->dev.parent, &param);
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>
>
>