Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] genirq: Cleanup the abuse of irq_set_affinity_hint()

[Nitesh Lal]

On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 1:44 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 10 2021 at 08:51, Nitesh Lal wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 5:16 PM Nitesh Lal <nilal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > The more general question is whether I should queue all the others or
> >> > whether some subsystem would prefer to pull in a tagged commit on top of
> >> > rc1. I'm happy to carry them all of course.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I am fine either way.
> >> In the past, while I was asking for more testing help I was asked if the
> >> SCSI changes are part of Martins's scsi-fixes tree as that's something
> >> Broadcom folks test to check for regression.
> >> So, maybe Martin can pull this up?
> >>
> >
> > Gentle ping.
> > Any thoughts on the above query?
>
> As nobody cares, I'll pick it up.
>

Sounds good to me.
Thank you!

--
Nitesh