Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] refcount: Use atomic_*_ofl()

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Dec 08 2021 - 14:19:45 EST

Next message: Kees Cook: "Re: [PATCH] find: Do not read beyond variable boundaries on small sizes"
Previous message: Sean Christopherson: "Re: [PATCH 04/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Retry page fault if root is invalidated by memslot update"
In reply to: Peter Zijlstra: "[RFC][PATCH 2/5] refcount: Use atomic_*_ofl()"
Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] refcount: Use atomic_*_ofl()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 07:36:57PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Use the shiny new atomic_*_ofl() functions in order to have better
> code-gen.
>

*sigh*, so I forgot to adjust the other primitives to the slightly
tweaked range of these new functions..

Next message: Kees Cook: "Re: [PATCH] find: Do not read beyond variable boundaries on small sizes"
Previous message: Sean Christopherson: "Re: [PATCH 04/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Retry page fault if root is invalidated by memslot update"
In reply to: Peter Zijlstra: "[RFC][PATCH 2/5] refcount: Use atomic_*_ofl()"
Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] refcount: Use atomic_*_ofl()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]