Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] arm: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef

[Emil Renner Berthing]

Hi Jisheng,

On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 06:22, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Replace the conditional compilation using "#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE"
> by a check for "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD)", to simplify the

The patch looks fine, but I think you mean
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) here, not CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD.

/Emil

> code and increase compile coverage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> index 284a80c0b6e1..f9a054a344c0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -973,7 +973,6 @@ static int __init init_machine_late(void)
>  }
>  late_initcall(init_machine_late);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
>  /*
>   * The crash region must be aligned to 128MB to avoid
>   * zImage relocating below the reserved region.
> @@ -1001,6 +1000,9 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
>         unsigned long long total_mem;
>         int ret;
>
> +       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE))
> +               return;
> +
>         total_mem = get_total_mem();
>         ret = parse_crashkernel(boot_command_line, total_mem,
>                                 &crash_size, &crash_base);
> @@ -1056,9 +1058,6 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
>                 insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_boot_res);
>         }
>  }
> -#else
> -static inline void reserve_crashkernel(void) {}
> -#endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC */
>
>  void __init hyp_mode_check(void)
>  {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv