Re: [PATCH -next] wireless: Clean up some inconsistent indenting

From: Brian Norris
Date: Thu Dec 02 2021 - 12:38:02 EST


Hi,

On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 7:04 PM Yang Li <yang.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Eliminate the follow smatch warnings:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c:3376
> mwifiex_unregister_dev() warn: inconsistent indenting
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/uap_event.c:285
> mwifiex_process_uap_event() warn: inconsistent indenting
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c:797
> mwifiex_process_sta_event() warn: inconsistent indenting

Thanks for looking at the smatch warnings! But I think you've taken
the wrong action on two of them. See below.

> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/uap_event.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c
> index d5fb294..43bdcbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c
> @@ -3373,7 +3373,7 @@ static void mwifiex_unregister_dev(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
> } else {
> mwifiex_dbg(adapter, INFO,
> "%s(): calling free_irq()\n", __func__);
> - free_irq(card->dev->irq, &card->share_irq_ctx);
> + free_irq(card->dev->irq, &card->share_irq_ctx);
>
> if (card->msi_enable)
> pci_disable_msi(pdev);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c
> index 80e5d44..9a3fbfb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c
> @@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ int mwifiex_process_sta_event(struct mwifiex_private *priv)
> MWIFIEX_TxPD_POWER_MGMT_LAST_PACKET))
> adapter->ps_state =
> PS_STATE_SLEEP;
> - return 0;
> + return 0;

Hmm, I have a strong suspicion that the *indentation* was actually
correct, and your stylistic warning actually signals that the braces
are incorrect. See how the assignment to 'ps_state' is clobbered just
a few lines below; I suspect the failure to send a null packet is
supposed to mean we should exit this function immediately, and all
other cases are supposed to continue.

> }
> }
> adapter->ps_state = PS_STATE_AWAKE;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/uap_event.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/uap_event.c
> index 2e25d72..e31de7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/uap_event.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/uap_event.c
> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ int mwifiex_process_uap_event(struct mwifiex_private *priv)
> MWIFIEX_TxPD_POWER_MGMT_LAST_PACKET))
> adapter->ps_state =
> PS_STATE_SLEEP;
> - return 0;
> + return 0;

Same here.

Brian

> }
> }
> adapter->ps_state = PS_STATE_AWAKE;
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>