Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: Fix a comment in cpufreq_policy_free

[Viresh Kumar]

On 01-12-21, 15:40, Tang Yizhou wrote:
> Make the comment of blocking_notifier_call_chain() easier to
> understand.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <tangyizhou@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index e338d2f010fe..db0b4b4258d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1296,8 +1296,9 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  
>  	if (policy->max_freq_req) {
>  		/*
> -		 * CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification is sent only after
> -		 * successfully adding max_freq_req request.
> +		 * Remove max_freq_req after sending CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY
> +		 * notification, since CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification was
> +		 * sent after adding max_freq_req earlier.
>  		 */
>  		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
>  					     CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY, policy);

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
viresh