[PATCH v2] sched/fair: Remove the cost of a redundant cpumask_next_wrap in select_idle_cpu

[Barry Song]

From: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This patch keeps the same scanning amount, but drops a redundant loop
of cpumask_next_wrap.
The original code did for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target + 1), then
checked --nr; this patch does --nr before doing the next loop, thus,
it can remove a cpumask_next_wrap() which costs a little bit.

Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 -v2: make code clearer with respect to Peter's comment

 kernel/sched/fair.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6e476f6..8cd23f1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6278,6 +6278,7 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
 		time = cpu_clock(this);
 	}
 
+	--nr;
 	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target + 1) {
 		if (has_idle_core) {
 			i = select_idle_core(p, cpu, cpus, &idle_cpu);
@@ -6285,11 +6286,11 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
 				return i;
 
 		} else {
-			if (!--nr)
-				return -1;
 			idle_cpu = __select_idle_cpu(cpu, p);
 			if ((unsigned int)idle_cpu < nr_cpumask_bits)
 				break;
+			if (!--nr)
+				return -1;
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
1.8.3.1