Re: spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested'

From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Wed Nov 24 2021 - 02:49:26 EST


On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 8:31 AM Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/23/21 5:38 AM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>
> diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> b/arch/sh/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> index 208f131659c5..65c3a94bff48 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> +++ b/arch/sh/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> @@ -437,7 +437,7 @@
> 432 common fsmount sys_fsmount
> 433 common fspick sys_fspick
> 434 common pidfd_open sys_pidfd_open
> -# 435 reserved for clone3
> +435 common clone3 sys_clone3
> 436 common close_range sys_close_range
> 437 common openat2 sys_openat2
> 438 common pidfd_getfd sys_pidfd_getfd

Did you test clone3? This needs a custom wrapper on most architectures
to have sensible calling conventions. If sh doesn't need it, that should
be explained in the changelog text.

> @@ -451,3 +451,4 @@
> 446 common landlock_restrict_self sys_landlock_restrict_self
> # 447 reserved for memfd_secret
> 448 common process_mrelease sys_process_mrelease
> +449 common futex_waitv sys_futex_waitv

I don't know what's going on with this one, I don't actually see
a reason why it isn't already wired up on all architectures. If we add
this, it should probably be done for all architectures at once as a
bugfix, but it's possible that this is intentionally only used on
x86 and arm.

André, can you comment on this?

Arnd