Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] iio/scmi: Add reading "raw" attribute.

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Thu Sep 30 2021 - 12:29:26 EST


On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 16:22:02 +0300
Andriy Tryshnivskyy <andriy.tryshnivskyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Add IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW to the mask and implement corresponding
> reading "raw" attribute in scmi_iio_read_raw.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andriy Tryshnivskyy <andriy.tryshnivskyy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Andriy,

Looks good to me, but I'll leave it on list to get feedback form the
driver maintainer for this one.

Feel free to poke if no reply in next 2 weeks.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
> drivers/iio/common/scmi_sensors/scmi_iio.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/scmi_sensors/scmi_iio.c b/drivers/iio/common/scmi_sensors/scmi_iio.c
> index 7cf2bf282cef..c6a9dc6ad140 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/common/scmi_sensors/scmi_iio.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/scmi_sensors/scmi_iio.c
> @@ -286,6 +286,9 @@ static int scmi_iio_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> struct scmi_iio_priv *sensor = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> s8 scale;
> int ret;
> + int err;
> + u32 sensor_config;
> + struct scmi_sensor_reading readings[SCMI_IIO_NUM_OF_AXIS];
>
> switch (mask) {
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> @@ -300,6 +303,45 @@ static int scmi_iio_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> ret = scmi_iio_get_odr_val(iio_dev, val, val2);
> return ret ? ret : IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> + sensor_config = FIELD_PREP(SCMI_SENS_CFG_SENSOR_ENABLED_MASK,
> + SCMI_SENS_CFG_SENSOR_ENABLE);
> + err = sensor->handle->sensor_ops->config_set(
> + sensor->handle, sensor->sensor_info->id, sensor_config);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(&iio_dev->dev,
> + "Error in enabling sensor %s err %d",
> + sensor->sensor_info->name, err);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + err = sensor->handle->sensor_ops->reading_get_timestamped(
> + sensor->handle, sensor->sensor_info->id,
> + sensor->sensor_info->num_axis, readings);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(&iio_dev->dev,
> + "Error in reading raw attribute for sensor %s err %d",
> + sensor->sensor_info->name, err);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + sensor_config = FIELD_PREP(SCMI_SENS_CFG_SENSOR_ENABLED_MASK,
> + SCMI_SENS_CFG_SENSOR_DISABLE);
> + err = sensor->handle->sensor_ops->config_set(
> + sensor->handle, sensor->sensor_info->id, sensor_config);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(&iio_dev->dev,
> + "Error in enabling sensor %s err %d",
> + sensor->sensor_info->name, err);
> + return err;
> + }
> + /* Check if raw value fits 32 bits */
> + if (readings[ch->scan_index].value < INT_MIN ||
> + readings[ch->scan_index].value > INT_MAX)
> + return -ERANGE;
> + /* Use 32-bit value, since practically there is no need in 64 bits */
> + *val = (int)readings[ch->scan_index].value;
> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -381,7 +423,8 @@ static void scmi_iio_set_data_channel(struct iio_chan_spec *iio_chan,
> iio_chan->type = type;
> iio_chan->modified = 1;
> iio_chan->channel2 = mod;
> - iio_chan->info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE);
> + iio_chan->info_mask_separate =
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE) | BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW);
> iio_chan->info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ);
> iio_chan->info_mask_shared_by_type_available =
> BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ);