Re: [PATCH net-next 2/7] page_pool: support non-split page with PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG

From: Yunsheng Lin
Date: Fri Sep 24 2021 - 03:23:23 EST


On 2021/9/23 20:08, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
>
> On 22/09/2021 11.41, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>> Currently when PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG is set, the caller is not
>> expected to call page_pool_alloc_pages() directly because of
>> the PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG checking in __page_pool_put_page().
>>
>> The patch removes the above checking to enable non-split page
>> support when PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG is set.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@xxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> net/core/page_pool.c | 12 +++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
>> index a65bd7972e37..f7e71dcb6a2e 100644
>> --- a/net/core/page_pool.c
>> +++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
>> @@ -315,11 +315,14 @@ struct page *page_pool_alloc_pages(struct page_pool *pool, gfp_t gfp)
>> /* Fast-path: Get a page from cache */
>> page = __page_pool_get_cached(pool);
>> - if (page)
>> - return page;
>> /* Slow-path: cache empty, do real allocation */
>> - page = __page_pool_alloc_pages_slow(pool, gfp);
>> + if (!page)
>> + page = __page_pool_alloc_pages_slow(pool, gfp);
>> +
>> + if (likely(page))
>> + page_pool_set_frag_count(page, 1);
>> +
>
> I really don't like that you add one atomic_long_set operation per page alloc call.
> This is a fast-path for XDP use-cases, which you are ignoring as you drivers doesn't implement XDP.
>
> As I cannot ask you to run XDP benchmarks, I fortunately have some page_pool specific microbenchmarks you can run instead.
>
> I will ask you to provide before and after results from running these benchmarks [1] and [2].
>
> [1] https://github.com/netoptimizer/prototype-kernel/blob/master/kernel/lib/bench_page_pool_simple.c
>
> [2] https://github.com/netoptimizer/prototype-kernel/blob/master/kernel/lib/bench_page_pool_cross_cpu.c
>
> How to use these module is documented here[3]:
> [3] https://prototype-kernel.readthedocs.io/en/latest/prototype-kernel/build-process.html

Will running these benchmarks to see if any performance overhead noticable here,
thanks for the benchmarks.

>
>> return page;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_pool_alloc_pages);
>> @@ -428,8 +431,7 @@ __page_pool_put_page(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page,
>> unsigned int dma_sync_size, bool allow_direct)
>> {
>> /* It is not the last user for the page frag case */
>> - if (pool->p.flags & PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG &&
>> - page_pool_atomic_sub_frag_count_return(page, 1))
>> + if (page_pool_atomic_sub_frag_count_return(page, 1))
>> return NULL;
>
> This adds an atomic_long_read, even when PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG is not set.

The point here is to have consistent handling for both PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG
and non-PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG case in the following patch.

As the page->_refcount is accessed in "page_ref_count(page) == 1" checking
in __page_pool_put_page(), and page->pp_frag_count is most likely in the
same cache line as the page->_refcount, So I am not expecting a noticable
overhead here.

Anyway, will use the above benchmarks as an example to verify it.


>
>> /* This allocator is optimized for the XDP mode that uses
>>
>
> .
>