Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 05/13] blk-mq-sched: Rename blk_mq_sched_alloc_{tags -> map_and_rqs}()

From: John Garry
Date: Tue Sep 14 2021 - 04:09:18 EST



+static int blk_mq_sched_alloc_map_and_rqs(struct request_queue *q,
+                      struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
+                      unsigned int hctx_idx)
  {
      struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set;
      int ret;
@@ -609,15 +609,15 @@ int blk_mq_init_sched(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e)
                     BLKDEV_DEFAULT_RQ);
      queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
-        ret = blk_mq_sched_alloc_tags(q, hctx, i);
+        ret = blk_mq_sched_alloc_map_and_rqs(q, hctx, i);
          if (ret)
-            goto err_free_tags;
+            goto err_free_map_and_rqs;
      }
      if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(q->tag_set->flags)) {
          ret = blk_mq_init_sched_shared_sbitmap(q);
          if (ret)
-            goto err_free_tags;
+            goto err_free_map_and_rqs;
      }
      ret = e->ops.init_sched(q, e);
@@ -645,8 +645,8 @@ int blk_mq_init_sched(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e)
  err_free_sbitmap:
      if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(q->tag_set->flags))
          blk_mq_exit_sched_shared_sbitmap(q);
-err_free_tags:
      blk_mq_sched_free_requests(q);
+err_free_map_and_rqs:
      blk_mq_sched_tags_teardown(q);
      q->elevator = NULL;
      return ret;

This is not only a rename, but it also moves the location of the label.
Is that intended?
If so it needs some documentation why this is safe.

Yeah, I think you're right.

The final code in the series looks correct, but this is a transient breakage.

I'll fix it.

Thanks,
John