Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] mm: provide one common K(x) macro

[Michal Hocko]

On Wed 01-09-21 11:21:49, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> There are various places where the K(x) macro is defined. This commit
> gets rid of multiple definitions and provides a common one.
> 
> This doesn't solve open-coding this macro in various other places. This
> should be addressed by another subsequent commit.

Why is this an improvement? You are adding a header file for a single
macro which sounds like an overkill. The overall net outcome is added
lines of code. It is not like K() or any of its variant is adding a
maintenance burden due to code duplication. So why do we want to change
the existing state?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs