Re: [PATCH] mei: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API

[Christophe JAILLET]

Le 24/08/2021 à 15:43, Greg KH a écrit :
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 10:02:59PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away.
> >
> > The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below.
> >
> > It has been compile tested.
> >
> >
> > @@
> > @@
> > -    PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
> > +    DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
> >
> > @@
> > @@
> > -    PCI_DMA_TODEVICE
> > +    DMA_TO_DEVICE
> >
> > @@
> > @@
> > -    PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE
> > +    DMA_FROM_DEVICE
> >
> > @@
> > @@
> > -    PCI_DMA_NONE
> > +    DMA_NONE
> >
> > @@
> > expression e1, e2, e3;
> > @@
> > -    pci_alloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
> > +    dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)
> >
> > @@
> > expression e1, e2, e3;
> > @@
> > -    pci_zalloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
> > +    dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)
> >
> > @@
> > expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> > @@
> > -    pci_free_consistent(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> > +    dma_free_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> >
> > @@
> > expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> > @@
> > -    pci_map_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> > +    dma_map_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> >
> > @@
> > expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> > @@
> > -    pci_unmap_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> > +    dma_unmap_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> >
> > @@
> > expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5;
> > @@
> > -    pci_map_page(e1, e2, e3, e4, e5)
> > +    dma_map_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4, e5)
> >
> > @@
> > expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> > @@
> > -    pci_unmap_page(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> > +    dma_unmap_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> >
> > @@
> > expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> > @@
> > -    pci_map_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> > +    dma_map_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> >
> > @@
> > expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> > @@
> > -    pci_unmap_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> > +    dma_unmap_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> >
> > @@
> > expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> > @@
> > -    pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> > +    dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> >
> > @@
> > expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> > @@
> > -    pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> > +    dma_sync_single_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> >
> > @@
> > expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> > @@
> > -    pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> > +    dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> >
> > @@
> > expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> > @@
> > -    pci_dma_sync_sg_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> > +    dma_sync_sg_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
> >
> > @@
> > expression e1, e2;
> > @@
> > -    pci_dma_mapping_error(e1, e2)
> > +    dma_mapping_error(&e1->dev, e2)
> >
> > @@
> > expression e1, e2;
> > @@
> > -    pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2)
> > +    dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
> >
> > @@
> > expression e1, e2;
> > @@
> > -    pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2)
> > +    dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> That is a lot of different things in one changelog text, yet you really
> only did a replacement for pci_set_dma_mask here.  Please clean up the
> changelog to reflect what you did, and most importantly, _WHY_ you are
> doing it.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Hi,

thx for the feed-back.

I've continued my serie and just sent "[PATCH] niu: switch from 'pci_' 
to 'dma_' API" where you are also in copy.

I've tried to improve the log message in it, giving references of why 
these clean-ups are done (proposed by Christoph Hellwig) and some 
reasons of why it is a good idea (argumentation from Julia Lawall)

The long coccinelle script has been reduced to only relevant parts.

I hope that this new version is good enough.


Comments on the "niu" drivers will also be taken into account when I 
will send a v2 for patches you have commented on.

CJ