Re: [PATCH][RFC] lockdep: improve comments in wait-type checks

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Aug 24 2021 - 09:47:56 EST


On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:44:21AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 05:03:19AM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> > I think comments in wait-type checks may benifit from some comments
> > improvement.
>
> Thanks for looking into this!
>
> Even for an RFC patch, it's better that you write a proper commit log,
> and note that you can put all this background information right after
> the "---" line, if you think that will help people review it.
>
> > I recklessly add Paul to signed-off-by, because I asked his opinion
> > about comment in rcu_read_lock_bh part.
> >
>
> Probably a Suggested-by will suffice, but I leave that to Paul ;-)

This, also since Paul never actually touched the patch.

> > Thanks a lot
> > Zhouyi
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Please make you the last one in the "Signed-off-by" list, see
> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:
>
> "Notably, the last Signed-off-by: must always be that of the developer
> submitting the patch."

The first sob should be that of the author, and given that's the same
person as the submitter in this case, he's got a problem at his hands
;-)