Re: [PATCH 3/4] kunit: Add support for suite initialization and cleanup

From: Brendan Higgins
Date: Tue Jul 27 2021 - 17:27:06 EST


On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 2:24 PM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Bodo Stroesser <bostroesser@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Please also CC davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx, skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
kunit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, and linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for
KUnit changes in the future.

> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>

This seems pretty sensible.

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> include/kunit/test.h | 4 ++++
> lib/kunit/test.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
> index 24b40e5c160b..a6eef96a409c 100644
> --- a/include/kunit/test.h
> +++ b/include/kunit/test.h
> @@ -215,6 +215,8 @@ static inline char *kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(enum kunit_status status)
> * struct kunit_suite - describes a related collection of &struct kunit_case
> *
> * @name: the name of the test. Purely informational.
> + * @init_suite: called once per test suite before the test cases.
> + * @exit_suite: called once per test suite after all test cases.
> * @init: called before every test case.
> * @exit: called after every test case.
> * @test_cases: a null terminated array of test cases.
> @@ -229,6 +231,8 @@ static inline char *kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(enum kunit_status status)
> */
> struct kunit_suite {
> const char name[256];
> + int (*init_suite)(void);
> + void (*exit_suite)(void);

I like this idea. Many other unit testing libraries in other languages
have something similar.

I think it probably makes sense to not use any kind of context object
here (as you have done); nevertheless, I still think it is an
appropriate question for the list.

> int (*init)(struct kunit *test);
> void (*exit)(struct kunit *test);
> struct kunit_case *test_cases;
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
> index d79ecb86ea57..c271692ced93 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/test.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
> @@ -397,9 +397,19 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
> {
> char param_desc[KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE];
> struct kunit_case *test_case;
> + int res = 0;
>
> kunit_print_subtest_start(suite);
>
> + if (suite->init_suite)
> + res = suite->init_suite();
> +
> + if (res < 0) {
> + kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
> + "# Suite initialization failed (%d)\n", res);
> + goto end;
> + }
> +
> kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) {
> struct kunit test = { .param_value = NULL, .param_index = 0 };
> test_case->status = KUNIT_SKIPPED;
> @@ -439,6 +449,10 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
> test.status_comment);
> }
>
> + if (suite->exit_suite)
> + suite->exit_suite();
> +
> +end:
> kunit_print_subtest_end(suite);
>
> return 0;