Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/8] net: usb: asix: ax88772: add phylib support

From: Marek Szyprowski
Date: Mon Jun 21 2021 - 02:06:16 EST


Hi Oleksij,

On 18.06.2021 15:20, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 01:11:41PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> On 18.06.2021 13:04, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>> On 18.06.2021 12:13, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>>>> thank you for your feedback.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:39:12AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>>>> On 07.06.2021 10:27, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>>>>>> To be able to use ax88772 with external PHYs and use advantage of
>>>>>> existing PHY drivers, we need to port at least ax88772 part of asix
>>>>>> driver to the phylib framework.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> I found one more issue with this patch. On one of my test boards
>>>>> (Samsung Exynos5250 SoC based Arndale) system fails to establish network
>>>>> connection just after starting the kernel when the driver is build-in.
>>>>>
>>> If you build in the MAC driver, do you also build in the PHY driver?
>>> If the PHY driver is still a module this could explain why genphy
>>> driver is used.
>>> And your dmesg filtering suppresses the phy_attached_info() output
>>> that would tell us the truth.
>> Here is a bit more complete log:
>>
>> # dmesg | grep -i Asix
>> [    2.412966] usbcore: registered new interface driver asix
>> [    4.620094] usb 1-3.2.4: Manufacturer: ASIX Elec. Corp.
>> [    4.641797] asix 1-3.2.4:1.0 (unnamed net_device) (uninitialized):
>> invalid hw address, using random
>> [    5.657009] libphy: Asix MDIO Bus: probed
>> [    5.750584] Asix Electronics AX88772A usb-001:004:10: attached PHY
>> driver (mii_bus:phy_addr=usb-001:004:10, irq=POLL)
>> [    5.763908] asix 1-3.2.4:1.0 eth0: register 'asix' at
>> usb-12110000.usb-3.2.4, ASIX AX88772 USB 2.0 Ethernet, fe:a5:29:e2:97:3e
>> [    9.090270] asix 1-3.2.4:1.0 eth0: Link is Up - 100Mbps/Full - flow
>> control off
>>
>> This seems to be something different than missing PHY driver.
> Can you please test it:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c b/drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c
> index aec97b021a73..7897108a1a42 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/asix_devices.c
> @@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static int ax88772a_hw_reset(struct usbnet *dev, int in_pm)
> u16 rx_ctl, phy14h, phy15h, phy16h;
> u8 chipcode = 0;
>
> + netdev_info(dev->net, "ax88772a_hw_reset\n");
> ret = asix_write_gpio(dev, AX_GPIO_RSE, 5, in_pm);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto out;
> @@ -509,31 +510,7 @@ static int ax88772a_hw_reset(struct usbnet *dev, int in_pm)
> goto out;
> }
> } else if ((chipcode & AX_CHIPCODE_MASK) == AX_AX88772A_CHIPCODE) {
> - /* Check if the PHY registers have default settings */
> - phy14h = asix_mdio_read_nopm(dev->net, dev->mii.phy_id,
> - AX88772A_PHY14H);
> - phy15h = asix_mdio_read_nopm(dev->net, dev->mii.phy_id,
> - AX88772A_PHY15H);
> - phy16h = asix_mdio_read_nopm(dev->net, dev->mii.phy_id,
> - AX88772A_PHY16H);
> -
> - netdev_dbg(dev->net,
> - "772a_hw_reset: MR20=0x%x MR21=0x%x MR22=0x%x\n",
> - phy14h, phy15h, phy16h);
> -
> - /* Restore PHY registers default setting if not */
> - if (phy14h != AX88772A_PHY14H_DEFAULT)
> - asix_mdio_write_nopm(dev->net, dev->mii.phy_id,
> - AX88772A_PHY14H,
> - AX88772A_PHY14H_DEFAULT);
> - if (phy15h != AX88772A_PHY15H_DEFAULT)
> - asix_mdio_write_nopm(dev->net, dev->mii.phy_id,
> - AX88772A_PHY15H,
> - AX88772A_PHY15H_DEFAULT);
> - if (phy16h != AX88772A_PHY16H_DEFAULT)
> - asix_mdio_write_nopm(dev->net, dev->mii.phy_id,
> - AX88772A_PHY16H,
> - AX88772A_PHY16H_DEFAULT);
> + netdev_info(dev->net, "do not touch PHY regs\n");
> }
>
> ret = asix_write_cmd(dev, AX_CMD_WRITE_IPG0,

This doesn't help for this issue.

Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland