Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] powerpc/papr_scm: Properly handle UUID types and API

From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
Date: Wed Jun 16 2021 - 09:48:39 EST


On 6/16/21 7:13 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
Parse to and export from UUID own type, before dereferencing.
This also fixes wrong comment (Little Endian UUID is something else)
and should eliminate the direct strict types assignments.

Fixes: 43001c52b603 ("powerpc/papr_scm: Use ibm,unit-guid as the iset cookie")
Fixes: 259a948c4ba1 ("powerpc/pseries/scm: Use a specific endian format for storing uuid from the device tree")


Do we need the Fixes: there? It didn't change any functionality right? The format with which we stored cookie1 remains the same with older and newer code. The newer one is better?

Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Cc: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: added missed header (Vaibhav), updated comment (Aneesh),
rewrite part of the commit message to avoid mentioning the Sparse
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c | 27 +++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
index e2b69cc3beaf..b43be41e8ff7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <asm/plpar_wrappers.h>
#include <asm/papr_pdsm.h>
#include <asm/mce.h>
+#include <asm/unaligned.h>
#define BIND_ANY_ADDR (~0ul)
@@ -1101,8 +1102,9 @@ static int papr_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
u32 drc_index, metadata_size;
u64 blocks, block_size;
struct papr_scm_priv *p;
+ u8 uuid_raw[UUID_SIZE];
const char *uuid_str;
- u64 uuid[2];
+ uuid_t uuid;
int rc;
/* check we have all the required DT properties */
@@ -1145,16 +1147,23 @@ static int papr_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
p->hcall_flush_required = of_property_read_bool(dn, "ibm,hcall-flush-required");
/* We just need to ensure that set cookies are unique across */
- uuid_parse(uuid_str, (uuid_t *) uuid);
+ uuid_parse(uuid_str, &uuid);
+
/*
- * cookie1 and cookie2 are not really little endian
- * we store a little endian representation of the
- * uuid str so that we can compare this with the label
- * area cookie irrespective of the endian config with which
- * the kernel is built.
+ * The cookie1 and cookie2 are not really little endian.
+ * We store a raw buffer representation of the
+ * uuid string so that we can compare this with the label
+ * area cookie irrespective of the endian configuration
+ * with which the kernel is built.
+ *
+ * Historically we stored the cookie in the below format.
+ * for a uuid string 72511b67-0b3b-42fd-8d1d-5be3cae8bcaa
+ * cookie1 was 0xfd423b0b671b5172
+ * cookie2 was 0xaabce8cae35b1d8d
*/
- p->nd_set.cookie1 = cpu_to_le64(uuid[0]);
- p->nd_set.cookie2 = cpu_to_le64(uuid[1]);
+ export_uuid(uuid_raw, &uuid);
+ p->nd_set.cookie1 = get_unaligned_le64(&uuid_raw[0]);
+ p->nd_set.cookie2 = get_unaligned_le64(&uuid_raw[8]);
/* might be zero */
p->metadata_size = metadata_size;