Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] perf mem: Fix wrong verbose output for recording events

From: Jiri Olsa
Date: Mon May 31 2021 - 18:42:39 EST


On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 08:16:08AM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> Current code:
>
> for (j = 0; j < argc; j++, i++)
> rec_argv[i] = argv[j];
>
> if (verbose > 0) {
> pr_debug("calling: record ");
>
> while (rec_argv[j]) {
> pr_debug("%s ", rec_argv[j]);
> j++;
> }
> pr_debug("\n");
> }
>
> The entries of argv[] are copied to the end of rec_argv[], not
> copied to the beginning of rec_argv[]. So the index j at
> rec_argv[] doesn't point to the first event.
>
> Now we record the start index and end index for events in rec_argv[],
> and print them if verbose is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2:
> - New in v2.
>
> tools/perf/builtin-mem.c | 8 +++++---

hi,
do we need the same in c2c as well?

jirka

> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c b/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
> index 6b633df458c2..0fd2a74dbaca 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ static const char * const *record_mem_usage = __usage;
> static int __cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv, struct perf_mem *mem)
> {
> int rec_argc, i = 0, j, tmp_nr = 0;
> + int start, end;
> const char **rec_argv;
> char **rec_tmp;
> int ret;
> @@ -144,9 +145,11 @@ static int __cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv, struct perf_mem *mem)
> if (mem->data_page_size)
> rec_argv[i++] = "--data-page-size";
>
> + start = i;
> ret = perf_mem_events__record_args(rec_argv, &i, rec_tmp, &tmp_nr);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> + end = i;
>
> if (all_user)
> rec_argv[i++] = "--all-user";
> @@ -160,10 +163,9 @@ static int __cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv, struct perf_mem *mem)
> if (verbose > 0) {
> pr_debug("calling: record ");
>
> - while (rec_argv[j]) {
> + for (j = start; j < end; j++)
> pr_debug("%s ", rec_argv[j]);
> - j++;
> - }
> +
> pr_debug("\n");
> }
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>