Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] sched/topology: Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection

[Beata Michalska]

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 03:59:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 02:48:32PM +0100, Beata Michalska wrote:
> 
> > > > Where:
> > > >  arch_scale_cpu_capacity(L) = 512
> > > >  arch_scale_cpu_capacity(M) = 871
> > > >  arch_scale_cpu_capacity(B) = 1024
> > > 
> > > Low, High
> > > Small, Big
> > > 
> > > But you appear to have picked: Low and Big, which just doesn't make any
> > > sense. (Worse, L can also be Large :-)
> > >
> > (L)ittle, (M)edium, (B)ig
> > I can re-arrange the abbreviations used here.
> 
> Duh, I must really be having a bad day for not thinking of Little. I
> don't think you need to change this. S,M,L would be like a clothing
> store, but steps away from the big.Little thing.
>
That's how I would prefer it - keep the 'little' things
Thanks

---
BR
B.