Re: [PATCH 5.10 002/299] bus: mhi: core: Clear configuration from channel context during reset

From: Manivannan Sadhasivam
Date: Tue May 11 2021 - 02:17:41 EST


Hi Pavel,

On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:56:50PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > From: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > commit 47705c08465931923e2f2b506986ca0bdf80380d upstream.
> >
> > When clearing up the channel context after client drivers are
> > done using channels, the configuration is currently not being
> > reset entirely. Ensure this is done to appropriately handle
> > issues where clients unaware of the context state end up calling
> > functions which expect a context.
>
> > +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c
> > @@ -544,6 +544,7 @@ void mhi_deinit_chan_ctxt(struct mhi_con
> > + u32 tmp;
> > @@ -554,7 +555,19 @@ void mhi_deinit_chan_ctxt(struct mhi_con
> ...
> > + tmp = chan_ctxt->chcfg;
> > + tmp &= ~CHAN_CTX_CHSTATE_MASK;
> > + tmp |= (MHI_CH_STATE_DISABLED << CHAN_CTX_CHSTATE_SHIFT);
> > + chan_ctxt->chcfg = tmp;
> > +
> > + /* Update to all cores */
> > + smp_wmb();
> > }
>
> This is really interesting code; author was careful to make sure chcfg
> is updated atomically, but C compiler is free to undo that. Plus, this
> will make all kinds of checkers angry.
>
> Does the file need to use READ_ONCE and WRITE_ONCE?
>

Thanks for looking into this.

I agree that the order could be mangled between chcfg read & write and
using READ_ONCE & WRITE_ONCE seems to be a good option.

Bhaumik, can you please submit a patch and tag stable?

Thanks,
Mani

> Best regards,
> Pavel
> --
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany