Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] page_pool: recycle buffers

[Yunsheng Lin]

On 2021/5/7 18:19, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Fri, 7 May 2021 16:28:30 +0800
> Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 

[...]

> 
> I'm actually not against storing page_pool object ptr directly in
> struct-page.  It is a nice optimization.  Perhaps we should implement
> this optimization outside this patchset first, and let __xdp_return()
> for XDP-redirected packets also take advantage to this optimization?
> 
> Then it would feel more natural to also used this optimization in this
> patchset, right?

Yes, it would be good if XDP can take advantage of this optimization too.

Then it seems we can remove the "mem_id_ht"? if we want to support different
type of page pool in the future, the type field is in the page pool too
when page_pool object ptr directly in struct-page.

>