Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add cpu OPP tables

[Sudeep Holla]

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 07:58:21PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Add OPP tables required to scale DDR/L3 per freq-domain on SC7280 SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 135 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> index 0bb835aeae33..90220cecb368 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi


[...]

> @@ -248,6 +273,116 @@
>  		};
>  	};
>  
> +	cpu0_opp_table: cpu0_opp_table {
> +		compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> +		opp-shared;
> +
> +		cpu0_opp1: opp-300000000 {
> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <300000000>;
> +			opp-peak-kBps = <800000 9600000>;
> +		};
> +
> +		cpu0_opp2: opp-691200000 {
> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <691200000>;
> +			opp-peak-kBps = <800000 17817600>;
> +		};
> +
> +		cpu0_opp3: opp-806400000 {
> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <806400000>;
> +			opp-peak-kBps = <800000 20889600>;
> +		};
> +
> +		cpu0_opp4: opp-940800000 {
> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <940800000>;
> +			opp-peak-kBps = <1804000 24576000>;
> +		};
> +
> +		cpu0_opp5: opp-1152000000 {
> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1152000000>;
> +			opp-peak-kBps = <2188000 27033600>;
> +		};
> +
> +		cpu0_opp6: opp-1324800000 {
> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1324800000>;
> +			opp-peak-kBps = <2188000 33792000>;
> +		};
> +
> +		cpu0_opp7: opp-1516800000 {
> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1516800000>;
> +			opp-peak-kBps = <3072000 38092800>;
> +		};
> +
> +		cpu0_opp8: opp-1651200000 {
> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1651200000>;
> +			opp-peak-kBps = <3072000 41779200>;
> +		};
> +
> +		cpu0_opp9: opp-1804800000 {
> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1804800000>;
> +			opp-peak-kBps = <4068000 48537600>;
> +		};
> +
> +		cpu0_opp10: opp-1958400000 {
> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1958400000>;
> +			opp-peak-kBps = <4068000 48537600>;
> +		};
> +	};
> +

NACK, this breaks if there is a mismatch from what is read from the hardware
and what is presented in this table above. Either add it from the some
bootloader or other boot code to this table reading from the hardware/firmware
or find a way to link them without this.

Sorry I had warned long back about this when such links were discussed as
part of interconnect binding.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep