Re: [Patch v4 1/3] lib: Restrict cpumask_local_spread to houskeeping CPUs

[Nitesh Lal]

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 10:21 PM Jesse Brandeburg
<jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Nitesh Lal wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 2:21 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Nitesh,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 30 2021 at 12:14, Nitesh Lal wrote:
> > > > Based on this analysis and the fact that with your re-work the interrupts
> > > > seems to be naturally spread across the CPUs, will it be safe to revert
> > > > Jesse's patch
> > > >
> > > > e2e64a932 genirq: Set initial affinity in irq_set_affinity_hint()
> > > >
> > > > as it overwrites the previously set IRQ affinity mask for some of the
> > > > devices?
> > >
> > > That's a good question. My gut feeling says yes.
> > >
> >
> > Jesse do you want to send the revert for the patch?
> >
> > Also, I think it was you who suggested cc'ing
> > intel-wired-lan ml as that allows intel folks, to do some initial
> > testing?
> > If so, we can do that here (IMHO).
>
> Patch sent here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210501021832.743094-1-jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u
>
> Any testing appreciated!
>
> Jesse
>

Thank you!

--
Nitesh