Re: [PATCH v7 2/6] leds: Add driver for Qualcomm LPG

From: Bjorn Andersson
Date: Sun May 02 2021 - 17:15:49 EST


On Sat 01 May 16:09 CDT 2021, Marijn Suijten wrote:

> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On 4/29/21 11:15 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > The Light Pulse Generator (LPG) is a PWM-block found in a wide range of
> > PMICs from Qualcomm. It can operate on fixed parameters or based on a
> > lookup-table, altering the duty cycle over time - which provides the
> > means for e.g. hardware assisted transitions of LED brightness.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since v6:
> > - Moved code into drivers/leds/rgb/
> > - Reverted to earlier qcom,dtest handling to support routing pwm signals
> > through dtest lines.
> > - Remember the duration of each step of the pattern, rather than adding up and
> > then dividing when the value is used.
> > - Added missing error prints on DT parse errors.
> > - Added sm8150[lb] and made led source and atc presence optional
> > - Added missing parenthesis around (len + 1) / 2 in search for hi_pause in the
> > pattern.
> >
> > drivers/leds/Kconfig | 3 +
> > drivers/leds/Makefile | 3 +
> > drivers/leds/rgb/leds-qcom-lpg.c | 1286 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 1292 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/leds/rgb/leds-qcom-lpg.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/leds/Kconfig b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> > index 49d99cb084db..8ab06b3f162d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> > @@ -933,6 +933,9 @@ source "drivers/leds/blink/Kconfig"
> > comment "Flash and Torch LED drivers"
> > source "drivers/leds/flash/Kconfig"
> > +comment "RGB LED drivers"
> > +source "drivers/leds/rgb/Kconfig"
>
>
> It looks like this file is not included in any of the patches.
>

Sorry about that, seems like I missed adding them to the commit :(

> > +
> > comment "LED Triggers"
> > source "drivers/leds/trigger/Kconfig"
> > diff --git a/drivers/leds/Makefile b/drivers/leds/Makefile
> > index 7e604d3028c8..8cad0465aae0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/leds/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/leds/Makefile
> > @@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_USER) += uleds.o
> > # Flash and Torch LED Drivers
> > obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS_FLASH) += flash/
> > +# RGB LED Drivers
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS_MULTICOLOR) += rgb/
>
>
> This file appears to be missing from this patch(set), too.
>

Right, missed both the new files.

> > +static int lpg_lut_store(struct lpg *lpg, struct led_pattern *pattern,
> > + size_t len, unsigned int *lo_idx, unsigned int *hi_idx)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int idx;
> > + u16 val;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + /* Hardware does not behave when LO_IDX == HI_IDX */
> > + if (len == 1)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + idx = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(lpg->lut_bitmap, lpg->lut_size,
> > + 0, len, 0);
> > + if (idx >= lpg->lut_size)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> > + val = pattern[i].brightness;
> > +
> > + regmap_bulk_write(lpg->map, lpg->lut_base + LPG_LUT_REG(idx + i), &val, 1);
>
>
> This and the other regmap_bulk_write in lpg_apply_pwm_value used sizeof(val)
> before. As far as I'm aware qcom-spmi-pmic specifies 16-bit addresses
> (.reg_bits) but 8-bit register sizes (.val_bits). Writing one register
> means only 8 out of 16 bits in u16 val are written?
>

You're right and I should have used test pattern that shown that I lost
that 9th bit...

I'll restore the sizeof()

> > +static void lpg_apply_lut_control(struct lpg_channel *chan)
> > +{
> > + struct lpg *lpg = chan->lpg;
> > + unsigned int hi_pause;
> > + unsigned int lo_pause;
> > + unsigned int step;
> > + unsigned int conf = 0;
> > + unsigned int lo_idx = chan->pattern_lo_idx;
> > + unsigned int hi_idx = chan->pattern_hi_idx;
> > + int pattern_len;
> > +
> > + if (!chan->ramp_enabled || chan->pattern_lo_idx == chan->pattern_hi_idx)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + pattern_len = hi_idx - lo_idx + 1 > +
> > + step = chan->ramp_tick_ms;
>
>
> Since this is not dividing a full pattern duration by pattern_len anymore,
> that variable is now never read and best removed.
>

Ok

> > +static int lpg_parse_channel(struct lpg *lpg, struct device_node *np,
> > + struct lpg_channel **channel)
> > +{
> > + struct lpg_channel *chan;
> > + u32 color = LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN;
> > + u32 reg;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "reg", &reg);
> > + if (ret || !reg || reg > lpg->num_channels) {
> > + dev_err(lpg->dev, "invalid reg of %pOFn\n", np);
>
>
> Like \"color\" below, escape reg with \"reg\"?
>

Sounds good.

> > +static int lpg_add_led(struct lpg *lpg, struct device_node *np)
> > +{
> > + struct led_classdev *cdev;
> > + struct device_node *child;
> > + struct mc_subled *info;
> > + struct lpg_led *led;
> > + const char *state;
> > + int num_channels;
> > + u32 color = 0;
> > + int ret;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "color", &color);
> > + if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL) {
> > + dev_err(lpg->dev, "failed to parse \"color\" of %pOF\n", np);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (color == LED_COLOR_ID_MULTI)
>
>
> Since this driver now lives under rgb/, and is specifically for RGB leds
> (afaik), should this and the rest of the code use LED_COLOR_ID_RGB instead?
> There was a patch floating around on (if I remember correctly) ##linux-msm
> by Luca Weiss that performs the conversion, with some related changes.
>

I thought MULTICOLOR was the right color, but reading the comment on the
defines it seems RGB is the color I actually want. Will check out
z3ntu's changes as well.

> > +static int lpg_init_lut(struct lpg *lpg)
> > +{
> > + const struct lpg_data *data = lpg->data;
> > + size_t bitmap_size;
> > +
> > + if (!data->lut_base)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + lpg->lut_base = data->lut_base;
> > + lpg->lut_size = data->lut_size;
> > +
> > + bitmap_size = BITS_TO_BYTES(lpg->lut_size);
> > + lpg->lut_bitmap = devm_kzalloc(lpg->dev, bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!lpg->lut_bitmap)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + bitmap_clear(lpg->lut_bitmap, 0, lpg->lut_size);
>
>
> devm_kzalloc already zeroes the bitmap. Is it necessary to clear it again
> (assuming a "cleared" bitmap is implementation-dependent and does not imply
> zeroed memory) or could the memory be allocated with devm_kalloc instead?
>

You're right, I can drop the explicit clear of the bitmap.

Thanks,
Bjorn