Re: arm32: panic in move_freepages (Was [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid())

[Mike Rapoport]

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 07:08:59PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> 
> On 2021/4/27 14:23, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:26:38PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> > > On 2021/4/26 13:20, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 03:51:56PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> > > > > On 2021/4/25 15:19, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > >       On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 04:11:16PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > >           I tested this patchset(plus arm32 change, like arm64 does)
> > > > >           based on lts 5.10，add some debug log, the useful info shows
> > > > >           below, if we enable HOLES_IN_ZONE, no panic, any idea,
> > > > >           thanks.
> > > > > 
> > > > >       Are there any changes on top of 5.10 except for pfn_valid() patch?
> > > > >       Do you see this panic on 5.10 without the changes?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yes, there are some BSP support for arm board based on 5.10,
> > Is it possible to test 5.12?

Do you use SPARSMEM? If yes, what is your section size?
What is the value if CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER in your configuration?

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.