Re: [PATCH 010/141] ima: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

From: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Date: Tue Apr 20 2021 - 16:53:57 EST


Hi all,

Friendly ping: who can take this, please?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

On 11/20/20 12:25, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
> warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of just
> letting the code fall through to the next case.
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 1 +
> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> index 2d1af8899cab..600b97677085 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> @@ -743,6 +743,7 @@ int ima_load_data(enum kernel_load_data_id id, bool contents)
> pr_err("impossible to appraise a module without a file descriptor. sig_enforce kernel parameter might help\n");
> return -EACCES; /* INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN */
> }
> + break;
> default:
> break;
> }
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> index 9b5adeaa47fc..ea634fc3b82f 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> @@ -566,6 +566,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
> rc = ima_filter_rule_match(secid, rule->lsm[i].type,
> Audit_equal,
> rule->lsm[i].rule);
> + break;
> default:
> break;
> }
> @@ -802,6 +803,7 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void)
> add_rules(default_measurement_rules,
> ARRAY_SIZE(default_measurement_rules),
> IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY);
> + break;
> default:
> break;
> }
>