Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] powerpc/bitops: Use immediate operand when possible

From: Segher Boessenkool
Date: Wed Apr 14 2021 - 13:25:44 EST


On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 03:32:04PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Segher Boessenkool
> > Sent: 14 April 2021 16:19
> ...
> > > Could the kernel use GCC builtin atomic functions instead ?
> > >
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fatomic-Builtins.html
> >
> > Certainly that should work fine for the simpler cases that the atomic
> > operations are meant to provide. But esp. for not-so-simple cases the
> > kernel may require some behaviour provided by the existing assembler
> > implementation, and not by the atomic builtins.
> >
> > I'm not saying this cannot work, just that some serious testing will be
> > needed. If it works it should be the best of all worlds, so then it is
> > a really good idea yes :-)
>
> I suspect they just add an extra layer of abstraction that makes it
> even more difficult to verify and could easily get broken by a compiler
> update (etc).

I would say it uses an existing facility, instead of creating a kernel-
specific one.

> The other issue is that the code needs to be correct with compiled
> with (for example) -O0.
> That could very easily break anything except the asm implementation
> if additional memory accesses and/or increased code size cause grief.

The compiler generates correct code. New versions of the compiler or
old, -O0 or not, under any phase of the moon.

Of course sometimes the compiler is broken, but there are pre-existing
ways of dealing with that, and there is no reason at all to think this
would break more often than random other code.


Segher