Re: [Resend RFC PATCH V2 04/12] HV: Add Write/Read MSR registers via ghcb

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Wed Apr 14 2021 - 11:41:57 EST

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [Resend RFC PATCH V2 08/12] UIO/Hyper-V: Not load UIO HV driver in the isolation VM."
Previous message: Marc Kleine-Budde: "Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Add support for generic CAN transceiver driver"
In reply to: Tianyu Lan: "[Resend RFC PATCH V2 04/12] HV: Add Write/Read MSR registers via ghcb"
Next in thread: Tianyu Lan: "Re: [Resend RFC PATCH V2 04/12] HV: Add Write/Read MSR registers via ghcb"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hv_ghcb_msr_write);

Just curious, who is going to use all these exports? These seems like
extremely low-level functionality. Isn't there a way to build a more
useful higher level API?

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [Resend RFC PATCH V2 08/12] UIO/Hyper-V: Not load UIO HV driver in the isolation VM."
Previous message: Marc Kleine-Budde: "Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Add support for generic CAN transceiver driver"
In reply to: Tianyu Lan: "[Resend RFC PATCH V2 04/12] HV: Add Write/Read MSR registers via ghcb"
Next in thread: Tianyu Lan: "Re: [Resend RFC PATCH V2 04/12] HV: Add Write/Read MSR registers via ghcb"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]